10 Thoughts On “AI,” February 2026 Edition

Posted on February 14, 2026 by John Scalzi

As we reach midway through February 2026, it feels like a good time to share some current thoughts on “AI” and where it stands in relation to my work and the broader landscape. These thoughts are in no particular order, and while some may have been noted before, I believe they are worth reiterating.

1. The Use of “AI” in My Work

I do not and will not use “AI” in any of my published works. There are several reasons for this decision. Firstly, “AI”-generated text is not copyrightable, and I want to avoid any potential ownership issues clouding my work. Additionally, my book contracts require that I write everything myself, without outsourcing to ghostwriters or “AI.” Most importantly, I believe I write better than any “AI” ever could, and I can do so with far less energy consumption. I can create a novel fueled by Coke Zero and snacks, without the environmental toll associated with “AI.” Using “AI” would only complicate my creative process, and I strive to minimize unnecessary work. If you’re reading a John Scalzi book, it is entirely the product of my own thoughts and creativity.

2. Concerns About Replacement

I am not worried about being replaced as a novelist by “AI.” While it is true that one can generate a novel-length work using “AI” faster than any human can write, the vast majority of this content will likely remain unread. Many individuals are producing a large volume of “AI” text that lacks quality and depth, leading to a saturation of unreadable material. The primary issue is discoverability: how will readers find this content? Many creators of “AI” text do not have effective marketing strategies, often relying on chance for visibility. In contrast, I have established a successful career as an author, with publishers contractually obligated to market my novels. Readers will know when my books are released, and they will be able to find them easily in both physical and digital bookstores. This visibility is a significant advantage over the “AI” text that lacks a personal touch and dedicated promotion.

3. Public Sentiment Towards “AI”

There is a growing public fatigue with “AI,” not just in creative fields but across various sectors. For instance, Microsoft recently acknowledged that its attempts to integrate “AI” into every aspect of its products were met with consumer resistance, prompting adjustments in its business strategy. The reality is that “AI” often fails to outperform existing applications and services, leading to increased costs for consumers. The rise of “AI” has driven up prices for memory and computing resources, creating a burden for users. As a result, human-generated work has a competitive edge, as people increasingly seek authenticity and genuine engagement in the content they consume. While some may be drawn to the sheer volume of “AI” output, I believe that most individuals will prefer to invest their time and money in the creative efforts of real people.

4. Supporting Human Artists

I am committed to supporting human artists, both in my professional and personal life. My contracts stipulate that all aspects of my book production, including covers, translations, and copyediting, must be handled by humans. This is not only a practical decision regarding quality and copyright but also a moral one. I want my work to contribute to the livelihoods of other artists. When purchasing art, I prioritize buying from individuals who created it, rather than opting for “AI”-generated pieces. I will not promote or share anything that is not the product of human creativity. I believe in the importance of supporting those who create, as they deserve recognition and compensation for their efforts.

5. The Value of Authenticity

Authenticity matters in creative work. Readers and consumers are increasingly aware of the differences between human-created content and “AI”-generated material. The emotional connection and unique perspectives that human artists bring to their work cannot be replicated by algorithms. While “AI” can produce text at a rapid pace, it lacks the depth and nuance that comes from human experience. As a result, I believe that audiences will gravitate toward authentic, human-created works that resonate with them on a personal level.

6. The Environmental Impact of “AI”

The environmental implications of “AI” technology cannot be overlooked. The energy consumption associated with running “AI” systems is substantial, contributing to increased carbon footprints. As a writer, I am conscious of my environmental impact and strive to create in a way that is sustainable. By choosing to rely on my own creativity rather than “AI,” I can minimize my ecological footprint while still producing meaningful work.

7. The Future of Creativity

As we look toward the future, it is essential to consider the role of creativity in society. While “AI” may offer new tools for creation, it is crucial to remember that true artistry comes from the human experience. The stories we tell, the emotions we evoke, and the connections we forge are inherently human endeavors. I believe that as technology continues to evolve, the value of human creativity will only grow in importance.

8. The Role of Publishers

Publishers play a vital role in the literary ecosystem, providing support and resources for authors. As an established author, I benefit from the marketing and distribution networks that publishers offer. This support is essential for reaching readers and ensuring that quality works are recognized in a crowded market. In contrast, “AI” text often lacks the backing of a dedicated publishing team, making it more challenging for such works to gain traction.

9. The Importance of Effort

Effort is a key component of creative work. The act of writing, creating, and refining a piece of art requires dedication and perseverance. While “AI” can generate content quickly, it does not embody the same level of commitment that human artists invest in their work. I believe that readers appreciate the effort that goes into creating a well-crafted story, and this appreciation fosters a deeper connection between the artist and the audience.

10. Embracing Change

Finally, it is essential to embrace change in the creative landscape. As technology advances, so too must our understanding of creativity and artistry. While I may have reservations about “AI,” I recognize that it is a part of our evolving world. The challenge lies in finding a balance that allows for innovation while preserving the value of human creativity. By supporting one another and prioritizing authentic artistic expression, we can navigate this changing landscape together.